SVB's climate tech clients face humbling funding questions

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>ANALYSIS-SVB's climate tech clients face humbling funding questions</title></head><body>

Govt action calms fears, but uncertainty remains

Equity values could take 5%-50% hit - MUUS chair

Startup executive: We're not special

By Ross Kerber and Isla Binnie

BOSTON / NEW YORK, March 17 (Reuters) -For years Silicon Valley Bank was a lender of choice for climate technology startups keen to tap specialised support for early-stage companies. Post its collapse, they may face higher finance costs wherever they next choose to bank.

The meltdown of the 40-year-old lender triggered days of stressful phone calls for many types of technology firms as they lined up contingency plans for funds, although some calm returned after U.S. authorities stepped in to insure their deposits.

For businesses with an environmental mission, the big question now is whether investor demand to address climate change will continue to help them secure attractive terms, or if less start-up friendly lenders prove tougher partnersas the broader banking system shudders.

At the start of 2022, SVB SIVB.O pledged to provide at least $5 billion in financing by 2027 to support sustainability efforts in industries including green buildings, renewable energy and water technology - seen as growth markets as the world shifts away from fossil fuels.

A number of startup executives and their VC backers, including Michael Sonnenfeldt, Chairman of MUUS Climate Partners, said the bank's collapse could lead to more difficult borrowing terms for their youngindustry.

The chillier financing climes, already in play as interest rates rose, would be particularly acute for companies looking to spend big as they scale, for example on building infrastructure.

Equity valuations couldbe impaired between 5% to 50% over the coming year, Sonnenfeldt said, but the wide range shows the uncertainty of the situation: "We don't know how bad it will, but it won't be good," he said.

Jane Melia, CEO of MUUS portfolio company Harvest Thermal, which makes low-energy heating systems and moved funds out of SVB on March 9, said she took heart from policy actions such as the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act, which would direct billions of dollars in subsidies to green energy.

"Very near-term, people are probably shaken... (although) I'm not worried about climate tech as a whole. Fundamentally this is a transition that's only going one way," she said.

Despite SVB's demise knocking the value of banks globally, particularly European lender Credit Suisse, U.N. climate envoy Mark Carney said he, too, did not expect a "material" impact on climate tech funding.

However, finance firm Alantra said it expects the bank sector's challenges to prompt venture capital lenders to focus more on quality firms that can scale and be capital efficient.

"At a minimum, this will likely drive continued tightening of investments and a push to have their portfolio companies cut (cash) burn," it said in a note.

Mona Dajani, partner at law firm Shearman and Sterling, said most of her clean energy clients either banked with SVB or faced some other impact from its troubles. SVB "cultivated a reputation as being very friendly to clean energy... they were willing to underwrite more risk," she said.

While rival banks now will likely pick up the slack, smaller and less-capitalized segments of clean energy will face stiffer terms such as residential or community solar projects, she said.

Climate tech took in more than a quarter of all venture money invested during the 12 months to end-September, but it was down 30% to $52 billion over the first three quarters of 2022 compared to the same period in 2021, consultants PwC said, with the number of early-stagedeals falling.


Cary Krosinsky, an academic and advisor on climate investing to several large asset managers, said the banking crisis will make it harder for companies to sustain recent valuations.

"I've been waiting for a bit of a shakeout. With any new sector there's a pattern. It was true for railroads, radio, and computers," he said. "Not all the companies are going to make it and now that’s happening to climate companies."

Dan Goldman, co-founder and managing partner of climate startup investor Clean Energy Ventures, said SVB had been a "prolific lender" to its portfolio companies, and the VC had "been on speed dial" to them as events unfolded.

"Our team is continuing to work with impacted companies within our portfolio to ensure the leadership teams have answers to immediate challenges like payroll, debt facilities and long-term capital markets strategy."

For many in the sector, the troublesof a bank that pitched itself as one of their own, will prove humbling.

Jonathan Levine, CEO of Folia Materials Inc in Boston, which makes paper products for applications like water purification, said SVB's collapse showed its tech-heavy client base they weren't special. He said it took him nearly a week to wire money out of SVB, nearly missing payroll for his five-person startup.

"All of us are just small businesses with money there. It doesn't matter if you're a roofer or a janitor service."

Swiss central bank throws financial lifeline to Credit Suisse after shares pummellednL4N35N192

Large US banks lead First Republic rescue, Credit Suisse takes up $54 bln lifelinenL1N35O01H

First Republic Bank to receive billions of dollars from large banks - sourcesnL4N35O47V

U.S. regulator eyes Friday bids for SVB, Signature Bank-sourcesnL1N35N1YW

Americans are wary of bailouts as banking concerns mount -Reuters/IpsosnL1N35N3EJ

ANALYSIS-SVB collapse unleashes Treasury volatility, whiplashing investorsnL1N35M01B

ANALYSIS-As banks shake, markets hear the sound of peaking ratesnL1N35L0OY

GRAPHIC-Bank stocks fall off a cliffhttps://tmsnrt.rs/3TjtKs2

GRAPHIC-Americans opt to keep their money with the bankshttps://tmsnrt.rs/3LrAFxq

GRAPHIC-Majority of Americans oppose a bank bailouthttps://tmsnrt.rs/408dP1Y

Reporting by Ross Kerber in Boston and by Isla Binnie in New York. Additional reporting by Jane Lee and by Laila Kearney. Editing by Simon Jessop and Nick Zieminski


免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限,并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容,但无意进行任何更改或扩展,也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限,将受下列条款与条例约束:(i) 条款与条例;(ii) 风险提示;以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意,网站所提供的所有讯息,仅限一般资讯用途。此外,XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成,也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。


本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容,包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接,皆保持不变,并作为一般市场评论所提供,而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料,仅适用于教育/资讯类用途,不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议,或是交易价格纪录,或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解,XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯,更多详情请点击 这里

风险提示: 您的资金存在风险。杠杆商品并不适合所有客户。请详细阅读我们的风险声明